Before the shareholder meeting, WMTS reviewed how some large public pension funds and proxy advisors were voting their shares for the different Board of Director candidates. Well, the results are in, and Directors Christopher Williams, Mike Duke and Rob Walton, yet again tallied high “no” votes. In an effort to shed some light on why large institutional investors voted against various director candidates, WMTS has looked into the reasoning of the two large public pension funds—Wisconsin (SWIB) and California (CalPERS). Both are among the largest public pension funds in the world with CalPERS ranking 6th and SWIB in 30th place, both with assets in the billions.
No one is expecting the election for Walmart directors to be a nail biter. What with the Walton family controlling more than 50 percent of the votes, you’d be foolish to bet against their reelection. However, how the non-Walton shares are voted will be revealing. Will the no-votes this year will be as large as last year when Lee Scott, Chris Williams, Mike Duke, and Rob Walton garnered the most no votes? The early numbers are starting to come in and it doesn’t look good for those four again this year. The NYC Pension Funds announced yesterday that it will vote its 5.1 million shares of Walmart stock against nine of Walmart’s 14 directors. NYC is casting its vote against Messieurs Scott, Williams, Duke, and Walton, as well as voting no on Directors Aida Alvarez, James Cash, Douglas Daft, Steven Reinemund, and Linda Wolf. CalSTRS is voting against all directors standing for election. Add to that the recommendations of two proxy advisers, ISS and Glass Lewis, who are each advising clients to vote against select directors – ISS recommends voting against Duke, Walton and Williams, while Glass Lewis is suggesting no votes against Duke, Williams, Scott, Alvarez, and Cash – and it could be another year of record no votes.